safespeed.org.uk Report : Visit Site

Technical data of the safespeed.org.uk

Geo IP provides you such as latitude, longitude and ISP (Internet Service Provider) etc. informations. Our GeoIP service found where is host safespeed.org.uk. Currently, hosted in United States and its service provider is Advantagecom Networks Inc. .

the related websites

quartix.net walesonline.co.uk 

HTTP Header Analysis

HTTP Header information is a part of HTTP protocol that a user's browser sends to called Apache/2.0.54 (Fedora) containing the details of what the browser wants and will accept back from the web server.

DNS

HtmlToText

safe speed road safety campaign visit main web site (over 350,000 words new: safe speed merchandise safe speed donations and membership please support the campaign we need you and you need us and see the all new ' associates scheme ' paul smith dies over 28,000 signed our official scrap speed cameras petition on the 10 downing street web site read our telegraph article to find out why. are you being prosecuted for a motoring offence? a very significant number of prosecutions are defective. the trick is to find the defect. a good firm of specialist lawyers may well be able to help. safe speed recommends: media: contact information : latest press releases 14th march 2007 dear road user, it's time to get angry. department for transport (dft) is following a road safety policy that they no longer believe in because they would rather save face than save lives . i'm quite sure that they used to believe that 'speed cameras saved lives', but in the last few years that's changed. in may 2005 they decided that speed camera side effects needed to be researched. in december 2005 they discovered that neglect of a statistical bias had exaggerated the main benefit of speed cameras by 400%. the claimed '100 lives per year saved at speed camera sites' is downgraded to 25 lives saved. in june 2006 they discovered that the ongoing beneficial trend in road crash serious injuries was just a feature of the way these crashes are reported. hospitalisation statistics don't show the same trend. road deaths don't show the same trend. in september 2006 they discovered that the proportion of injury crashes involving any speeding vehicle nationally was only 5% - not the 'one third' that they had previously claimed. in 2007 it gets nasty. in january the new funding for speed cameras was announced as grants given to local authorities. they quite deliberately chose not to ring fence the funding in the full knowledge that this will lead to a budgetary squeeze that will help speed cameras to fade away. there's also a transfer of responsibility for cameras away from dft and towards local authorities - that's because dft don't want the flak . in march we learned via freedom of information request that the speed camera side effects research (announced in may 2005) had been axed. it is inconceivable that the side effects don't cost more than 25 lives per year, meaning that speed cameras are making road safety worse . but dft doesn't want to hear this, which is the only possible reason for axing the most important research. so here's the truth. speed camera policy has failed catastrophically. department for transport knows that it has failed but won't admit their deadly mistake and pull the plug. they seem to be hoping that speed cameras will fade away over the next five years, yet they know that the policy isn't working and is costing lives. if that's not a reason for road users to get angry, i don't know what is. what can you do? - you can help us by joining the campaign or by donating . i can't stress enough how important this is. we're on a shoe string budget and desperately need better funding, but we're right at the forefront of putting this mess right. we're fighting against massive resources and need all the help we can possibly get . - you can sign our 10 downing street petition to ' scrap speed cameras '. at the very least this will help us to highlight the need for far better information, and ultimately for road safety policies that work. - you can write letters to newspapers or to your mp. - you can find out more by exploring this website or by joining the forums . whatever you do, don't do nothing , don't leave it to someone else and don't put up with it. it's time to get angry. yours faithfully paul smith safe speed campaign founder vital speed camera side effects research axed by government: download our 'side effects' report read our press release "we can only imagine that they would rather save face than save lives" the editor of the observer wrote (17th july 2005): " last week, the government announced a three-month moratorium on further speed cameras. this was partly in response to the work of engineer paul smith [safe speed's founder], who has spent 5,000 hours finding out why, though the number of cameras has risen exponentially, there has been no corresponding reduction in traffic fatalities. he concludes that, far from acting as a deterrent, speed cameras take responsibility for safe speed away from drivers, and their concentration from the road. cameras are as likely to cause an accident as to prevent one. " ( link ) the retiring editor (peter tomalin) of evo magazine wrote (july 2005 cover date): " while i still have this little soapbox, i would like to urge all of you to throw your weight behind two organisations: the association of british drivers (www.abd.org.uk) and safe speed. they talk an awful lot of common sense, and heaven knows we need a voice right now. " north wales daily post (september 2006): supporters of speed cameras will say that even 5% justifies their existence. but critics, including the safe speed campaign and this newspaper, who believed the government's simplistic single-solution approach to road safety was actually counter-productive, have also been insisting for years that cameras could themselves be a contributory cause of accidents by distracting drivers. this view also now seems to have been largely vindicated by the dot's findings. everyone concerned - not least this newspaper - wants to see road deaths reduced as far as is humanly possible, but the argument has always been how best to achieve this. by insisting that "speed" is the main culprit which can safely be left to cameras to enforce, many police forces until now have taken resources away from patrolling roads looking for bad, incompetent and dangerous driving. other more effective and cheaper (but non-revenue raising) calming methods have also been dismissed. no, we were told, speed kills regardless of road or weather conditions or the competence of the driver. ( link ) road safety road safety is complex, subtle and sensitive like a precision built clock. after over 100 years of living with motor transport we have learned much about how to manage enormous potential danger on our roads. we have learned as individuals, we have learned as engineers and we have learned as a society. road safety is finely tuned and balanced and for the most part works very well indeed. road safety is primarily a matter of psychology. speed camera a speed camera is a blunt and heavy instrument, like a hammer. it has far reaching effects. it changes driver behaviour. it changes everyone's safety priorities. it changes the way the roads are policed. it has done immeasurable damage to the police / public relationship. far from being a precision tool, it's the equivalent of a rather heavy and badly aimed hammer. speed cameras are obviously bad psychology. would you use a hammer to fix a clock? would you use a speed camera to improve road safety? neither would we. they are both the wrong tool for the job. but with the hammer it's easy to see the damage. new: recent media coverage of the safe speed campaign see our busy forum system the campaign needs your support see recent press releases visit main web site professor mervyn stone, hired by radio four to examine the safe speed case wrote (june 2004): turning now to the written statement of mr smith, the reader should know that i have downloaded most of the files, acquired most of the papers to which he referred, and gone through them with as much care and attention as i could summon. in itself, an achievement of sorts - but paling into insignificance compared with that of mr smith himself. he has single-handedly taken on the road safety establishment. he has brought to the fore hitherto neglected questions with admirable forensic skill and logic. he is a gad fly par excellence whose bite must have already irritated many in the road safety world who prefe

URL analysis for safespeed.org.uk

http://www.safespeed.org.uk/forum/index.php
http://www.safespeed.org.uk/sideeffects.pdf
http://www.safespeed.org.uk/forum/viewforum.php?f=16
http://www.safespeed.org.uk/index1.html
http://www.safespeed.org.uk/minddriving.html
http://www.safespeed.org.uk/index1.html
http://www.safespeed.org.uk/stone.html
http://www.safespeed.org.uk/associates.html
http://www.safespeed.org.uk/contact.html
http://www.safespeed.org.uk/join.html
http://www.safespeed.org.uk/pauldies.html
telegraph.co.uk
icnorthwales.icnetwork.co.uk
observer.guardian.co.uk
marymonson.co.uk
amazon.co.uk
petitions.pm.gov.uk

Whois Information

Whois is a protocol that is access to registering information. You can reach when the website was registered, when it will be expire, what is contact details of the site with the following informations. In a nutshell, it includes these informations;

Error for "safespeed.org.uk".

the WHOIS query quota for 2600:3c03:0000:0000:f03c:91ff:feae:779d has been exceeded
and will be replenished in 227 seconds

WHOIS lookup made at 09:44:50 07-Jul-2018

--
This WHOIS information is provided for free by Nominet UK the central registry
for .uk domain names. This information and the .uk WHOIS are:

Copyright Nominet UK 1996 - 2018.

You may not access the .uk WHOIS or use any data from it except as permitted
by the terms of use available in full at https://www.nominet.uk/whoisterms,
which includes restrictions on: (A) use of the data for advertising, or its
repackaging, recompilation, redistribution or reuse (B) obscuring, removing
or hiding any or all of this notice and (C) exceeding query rate or volume
limits. The data is provided on an 'as-is' basis and may lag behind the
register. Access may be withdrawn or restricted at any time.

  REFERRER http://www.nominet.org.uk

  REGISTRAR Nominet UK

SERVERS

  SERVER uk.whois-servers.net

  ARGS safespeed.org.uk

  PORT 43

  TYPE domain

DISCLAIMER
This WHOIS information is provided for free by Nominet UK the central registry
for .uk domain names. This information and the .uk WHOIS are:
Copyright Nominet UK 1996 - 2018.
You may not access the .uk WHOIS or use any data from it except as permitted
by the terms of use available in full at https://www.nominet.uk/whoisterms,
which includes restrictions on: (A) use of the data for advertising, or its
repackaging, recompilation, redistribution or reuse (B) obscuring, removing
or hiding any or all of this notice and (C) exceeding query rate or volume
limits. The data is provided on an 'as-is' basis and may lag behind the
register. Access may be withdrawn or restricted at any time.

  REGISTERED no

DOMAIN

  NAME safespeed.org.uk

NSERVER

  DNS1.SPEEDINGBITS.COM 66.29.143.2

  DNS2.SPEEDINGBITS.COM 66.29.143.102

Mistakes

The following list shows you to spelling mistakes possible of the internet users for the website searched .